Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Biomech Eng ; 143(12)2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34318314

RESUMO

Rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by means of quantifying wall stress is a common biomechanical strategy. However, the clinical translation of this approach has been greatly limited due to the complexity associated with the computational tools required for its implementation. Thus, being able to estimate wall stress using nonbiomechanical markers that can be quantified as a direct outcome of clinical image segmentation would be advantageous in improving the potential implementation of said strategy. In the present work, we investigated the use of geometric indices to predict patient-specific AAA wall stress by means of a novel neural network (NN) modeling approach. We conducted a retrospective review of existing clinical images of two patient groups: 98 asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic AAAs. The images were subject to a protocol consisting of image segmentation, processing, volume meshing, finite element modeling, and geometry quantification, from which 53 geometric indices and the spatially averaged wall stress (SAWS) were calculated. SAWS estimated from finite element analysis was considered the gold standard for the predictions. We developed feed-forward NN models composed of an input layer, two dense layers, and an output layer using Keras, a deep learning library in python. The NN models were trained, tested, and validated independently for both AAA groups using all geometric indices, as well as a reduced set of indices resulting from a variable reduction procedure. We compared the performance of the NN models with two standard machine learning algorithms (MARS: multivariate adaptive regression splines and GAM: generalized additive model) and a linear regression model (GLM: generalized linear model). With the reduced sets of indices, the NN-based approach exhibited the highest mean goodness-of-fit (for the symptomatic group 0.71 and for the asymptomatic group 0.79) and lowest mean relative error (17% for both groups). In contrast, MARS yielded a mean goodness-of-fit of 0.59 for the symptomatic group and 0.77 for the asymptomatic group, with relative errors of 17% for the symptomatic group and 22% for the asymptomatic group. GAM had a mean goodness-of-fit of 0.70 for the symptomatic group and 0.80 for the asymptomatic group, with relative errors of 16% for the symptomatic group and 20% for the asymptomatic group. GLM did not perform as well as the other algorithms, with a mean goodness-of-fit of 0.53 for the symptomatic group and 0.70 for the asymptomatic group, with relative errors of 19% for the symptomatic group and 23% for the asymptomatic group. Nevertheless, the NN models required a reduced set of 15 and 13 geometric indices to predict SAWS for the symptomatic and asymptomatic AAA groups, respectively. This was in contrast to the reduced set of nine and eight geometric indices required to predict SAWS with the MARS and GAM algorithms for each AAA group, respectively. The use of NN modeling represents a promising alternative methodology for the estimation of AAA wall stress using geometric indices as surrogates, in lieu of finite element modeling. The performance metrics of NN models are expected to improve with significantly larger group sizes, given the suitability of NN modeling for "big data" applications.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Ruptura Aórtica , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Ruptura Aórtica/complicações , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Redes Neurais de Computação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Estresse Mecânico
2.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 48(4): 1419-1429, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31980998

RESUMO

The objective of this work was to perform image-based classification of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) based on their demographic, geometric, and biomechanical attributes. We retrospectively reviewed existing demographics and abdominal computed tomography angiography images of 100 asymptomatic and 50 symptomatic AAA patients who received an elective or emergent repair, respectively, within 1-6 months of their last follow up. An in-house script developed within the MATLAB computational platform was used to segment the clinical images, calculate 53 descriptors of AAA geometry, and generate volume meshes suitable for finite element analysis (FEA). Using a third party FEA solver, four biomechanical markers were calculated from the wall stress distributions. Eight machine learning algorithms (MLA) were used to develop classification models based on the discriminatory potential of the demographic, geometric, and biomechanical variables. The overall classification performance of the algorithms was assessed by the accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and precision of their predictions. The generalized additive model (GAM) was found to have the highest accuracy (87%), AUC (89%), and sensitivity (78%), and the third highest specificity (92%), in classifying the individual AAA as either asymptomatic or symptomatic. The k-nearest neighbor classifier yielded the highest specificity (96%). GAM used seven markers (six geometric and one biomechanical) to develop the classifier. The maximum transverse dimension, the average wall thickness at the maximum diameter, and the spatially averaged wall stress were found to be the most influential markers in the classification analysis. A second classification analysis revealed that using maximum diameter alone results in a lower accuracy (79%) than using GAM with seven geometric and biomechanical markers. We infer from these results that biomechanical and geometric measures by themselves are not sufficient to discriminate adequately between population samples of asymptomatic and symptomatic AAA, whereas MLA offer a statistical approach to stratification of rupture risk by combining demographic, geometric, and biomechanical attributes of patient-specific AAA.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/classificação , Aprendizado de Máquina , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma Roto/classificação , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagem , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Análise de Elementos Finitos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
3.
Ann Biomed Eng ; 47(7): 1611-1625, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963384

RESUMO

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a vascular disease characterized by the enlargement of the infrarenal segment of the aorta. A ruptured AAA can cause internal bleeding and carries a high mortality rate, which is why the clinical management of the disease is focused on preventing aneurysm rupture. AAA rupture risk is estimated by the change in maximum diameter over time (i.e., growth rate) or if the diameter reaches a prescribed threshold. The latter is typically 5.5 cm in most clinical centers, at which time surgical intervention is recommended. While a size-based criterion is suitable for most patients who are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease, it is well known that some small AAA rupture or patients become symptomatic prior to a maximum diameter of 5.5 cm. Consequently, the mechanical stress in the aortic wall can also be used as an integral component of a biomechanics-based rupture risk assessment strategy. In this work, we seek to identify geometric characteristics that correlate strongly with wall stress using a sample space of 100 asymptomatic, unruptured, electively repaired AAA models. The segmentation of the clinical images, volume meshing, and quantification of up to 45 geometric measures of each AAA were done using in-house Matlab scripts. Finite element analysis was performed to compute the first principal stress distributions from which three global biomechanical parameters were calculated: peak wall stress, 99th percentile wall stress and spatially averaged wall stress. Following a feature reduction approach consisting of Pearson's correlation matrices with Bonferroni correction and linear regressions, a multivariate stepwise regression analysis was conducted to find the geometric measures most highly correlated with each of the biomechanical parameters. Our findings indicate that wall stress can be predicted by geometric indices with an accuracy of up to 94% when AAA models are generated with uniform wall thickness and up to 67% for patient specific, non-uniform wall thickness AAA. These geometric predictors of wall stress could be used in lieu of complex finite element models as part of a geometry-based protocol for rupture risk assessment.


Assuntos
Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Modelos Cardiovasculares , Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Humanos , Estresse Mecânico
4.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 31(3): 487-91, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25293530

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord infarction is extremely rare in childhood and can result from a wide range of causes. Fibrocartilaginous embolism can give rise to spinal stroke and mimic non-vascular disease such as acute transverse myelitis. CASE: We report two children who suffered an asymmetrical spinal cord infarction due to fibrocartilaginous embolism. The clinical presentation, radiological findings, and pathophysiology of fibrocartilaginous embolism are described. Each patient demonstrated marked clinical improvement after receiving extensive physical therapy and rehabilitation. One child demonstrated complete clinical recovery. The other had persistent asymmetrical foot weakness and distal sensory deficits. CONCLUSION: We outline the key clinical and radiographic features that enable spinal cord infarction to be differentiated from transverse myelitis. Prognosis depends on many factors such as extent and type of injury, level of the cord affected, and age at the time of spinal cord infarction.


Assuntos
Doenças das Cartilagens/complicações , Embolia/complicações , Infarto/etiologia , Medula Espinal/patologia , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
5.
J Neurosci Methods ; 154(1-2): 19-29, 2006 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16460810

RESUMO

Cerebrocortical neurons that store and release zinc synaptically are widely recognized as critical in maintenance of cortical excitability and in certain forms of brain injury and disease. Through the last 20 years, this synaptic release has been observed directly or indirectly and reported in more than a score of publications from over a dozen laboratories in eight countries. However, the concentration of zinc released synaptically has not been established with final certainty. In the present work we have considered six aspects of the methods for studying release that can affect the magnitude of zinc release, the imaging of the release, and the calculated concentration of released zinc. We present original data on four of the issues and review published data on two others. We show that common errors can cause up to a 3000-fold underestimation of the concentration of released zinc. The results should help bring consistency to the study of synaptic release of zinc.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/metabolismo , Sinapses/fisiologia , Zinco/metabolismo , Animais , Encéfalo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Corantes , Giro Denteado/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Giro Denteado/metabolismo , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Ácido Edético/farmacologia , Feminino , Corantes Fluorescentes , Técnicas In Vitro , Fibras Musgosas Hipocampais/química , Fibras Musgosas Hipocampais/metabolismo , Neurônios/metabolismo , Compostos Policíclicos , Gravidez , Piridinas , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Ratos Wistar , Vesículas Sinápticas/efeitos dos fármacos , Vesículas Sinápticas/metabolismo , Temperatura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...